(04-12-2021 12:07 AM)pesik Wrote:  it is you who cant walk away from a bad take...

all you needed to say was "grimes was better than i gave him credit for" ..and that would have ended it.. instead you are arguing the lead scorer for a top 20 team wasnt good...nonsensical

you pick a side and die on that take, there is no re-evaluation with you... say what you want about me but im not that stubborn, ill debate with you preseason all you want, but once the results are in, i live with them

you till this day wont admit that juco stats dont hold in this level.. despite every single juco on ecu's roster not holding, what originated the debate...you would rather die than admit you are wrong

I knew all of this debate felt eerily familiar. If you go back around page 24 of this thread, SJ was going on about how irreplaceable Hinton's production was going to be. He said there would be no way we would be elite at rebounding without him (spoiler alert: he was wrong). Multiple people mentioned that Grimes would help replace some of that production and low and behold Grimes was our 2nd leading rebounder (1st among guards). In the course of that debate you explicitly stated that if Hinton came back this year he would've been the captain of the team but either Mills or Grimes would be the best player on the team. SJ swore up and down that there was no way we could replace Hinton's production and tripled down on his ****** Grimes takes. We completely laid it out for him how our team approaches rebounding and how we would still be elite the next year. Which we were, despite losing the "greatest rebounder ever" according to SJ (Nate Hinton). That debate basically encapsulates the problem with this guy. He looks at advanced stats and thinks he has a complete understanding of the ins and outs of a team. Ironically I mentioned that we should bookmark the conversation (which I didn't do), because it would be relevant whenever Grimes had monster year and declared early. Lol


https://csnbbs.com/thread-886257-page-24.html