(10-07-2019 11:02 AM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(10-07-2019 10:54 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(10-07-2019 10:46 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-07-2019 10:39 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(10-07-2019 07:12 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  This is the Kavanaugh attack all over again. Thwy keep bringing people out of the bull pen. We have the transcript.

Yeah, I don't get this. We know exactly what was said. We don't need the opinions of 'witnesses'. Nobody is denying what was said and when.

Um, no, we don't know this for a certainty. The released report of the call even says that.

Quote:On September 25, the White House released what it called a “full, unredacted transcript” of US president Donald Trump’s phone call with president Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. In the fine print, though, it specifies that it’s “not a verbatim transcript of a discussion.”

Two linguists explain why calling the Ukraine memo a “transcript” is so wrong

Wow.. You use some of the weirdest sites to make your point.. Even though you're not a Democrat, you sure do pull for them.. AS much as you detest Schiff you sure are defending him..

So you agree he is correct you just don't like the site used just want to be clear here.

Did I say that?

Tom used a site to make his point.. I didn't say it was correct.. Reading is fundamental.

Before you start saying my intent, point it out in my statement.