(04-30-2021 08:08 AM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(04-30-2021 08:06 AM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote:  

(04-30-2021 08:00 AM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(04-30-2021 07:56 AM)Seahawk Nation 08 Wrote:  

(04-29-2021 09:45 PM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  I love the Pats getting Jones at 15. I’m not on the fields train, osu qbs have sucked in the nfl


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

1) Fields wasn't an Ohio St recruit. He started at Georgia.

2) If Fields HAD been recruited by OSU, he would have been the highest-caliber HS prospect to arrive there in a long time, maybe even program history. He was way higher caliber than Dwayne Haskins.

3) Ryan Day is VERY different from Urban Meyer when it comes to the QB's he looks for and succeeds with. It's hard to pin the Urban NFL QB failures on Day.

4) Which QB's from Cal succeeded in the NFL before or since Aaron Rodgers? How about Texas Tech prior or since Pat Mahomes?


The program argument is a weak one. Judge the prospect, not the program. Fields is an excellent gamble. The 4th QB off the board and there is no reason to think he can't be the top QB in the class.

I preferred both Fields and Lance (in that order) over who my Jets took at 2. Mormon Mahomes just doesn't seem to me to be a good fit in today's NFL. But then again I've been dead wrong on so many QB prospects before. For instance, Darnold was my top guy in 2018 prior to the Jets taking him, with Josh Allen un-draftable to me. Yeah, that worked out great.

You guys are taking the stance that i said he sucks, those words never came out of my mouth. I just didn't like him better than the other guys in the top 5. He could be Watson, he could be Darnold.
and before Mahomes at TT? Super Bowl Champ Kingsbury, Duh

I never said in my post the words "you think Fields sucks". And now you're once again moving the goalposts and changing what you said originally. lol. Your original words were: "I’m not on the fields train, osu qbs have sucked in the nfl". What else were we supposed to infer?

I hate the way you argue.

I don't hate the Mac Jones pick either, but only because he was ridiculously efficient and I don't know just how much stock to put on him having 3 amazing WR's. Was it 25 % of his success? 75 %? I didn't watch him often enough to say. But he's a worthwhile gamble at 15.

Just as Fields is a worthwhile gamble at 11.

You will see where i said they liked him, so they moved up to get him good job on them. I don't have any ill will towards the Bears, i hope this one works out for them, and it very well could. All i said is i didn't like him, I'm entitled to that.

You are entitled to whatever opinion you wish. Just make your arguments in good faith and stop constantly moving the goalposts in hindsight to suit your new positions.

If this opinion you just stated here was the one you posted initially, I would have agreed and moved on. It wasn't. So it just ended up a giant waste of time.