(05-14-2020 03:17 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(05-14-2020 10:24 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-14-2020 10:21 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(05-14-2020 10:13 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-14-2020 10:00 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Of course I know your position. I just don't see how you can describe yourself as the logical one.

Tell me again how Trump in 2015 realized he needed Hillary's emails to be made public so he could win Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and how he offered to do Putin's bidding for that favor that he could not afford to have done on his own. The basis of the Russia investigation. Very logical.

I love to hear the story, the old old story...

That isn't how you argue whether or not the conclusion about Mueller's team is logical. Notice how none of what you said is relevant?

It is all relevant to the word you used to make your argument - "logically".

No. It. Isn't.

You don't actually address the claim - instead, you side step it by trying to argue that another, non-germane issue isn't logical.

I don't give a flying **** about your claim, and therefore don't need to address it. Instead I am challenging your assertion that you think logically.

Ha, the truth comes out. At least you're admitting you're not actually trying to address my thought, and instead attack my personal competency.

Tanq is gonna roll in and scold you for such a blatant ad hom attack.