(05-14-2020 07:52 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-14-2020 07:32 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(05-14-2020 06:05 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-13-2020 10:08 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(05-13-2020 09:32 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Boo to that logic too. If Mueller wanted to catch someone on a process crime, he could have - instead, what did he do? He totally punted on the issue without putting his finger on the scale.

If you want to believe that, I suppose you have a right to do so.

Likewise, if you want to believe that Mueller and his group were trying to set a process crime trap and then completely punt on the issue of whether a process crime occurred.

Logically, why would one try to entrap another and then, when given the opportunity to suggest prosecution, decide they no longer wanted to entrap them?

Logically??? Logically???

I cannot believe I hear that word from somebody who could not logically put together a scenario in which Trump sold his soul to Russia in exchange for a few Face Book ads and the release of Hillary's spa schedule, all requested months before he announced he was running, is now relying on logic.

Logically, who has the better memory, the drunken teenager at a keg party or the adult woman in the Senate hallway?

Logically, who has more to gain politically from a continued crisis now, the Republicans or the Democrats?

Logically which outlet is the most biased, the one saying the WH is looking for solutiions or the one using phrases like "desperate' and 'chaotic"?

There is not much that is logical on the left side of the ledger.

I too am having my morning coffee. In my case, it enhances the thought process, not suppresses it.