(04-27-2020 10:59 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  To be honest, I haven't used the term 'slut' to describe those actions; yet somehow I am the focus of a decent amount of ire for talking those points. So is the terminology the issue, or is it just saying that that may have happened the issue?

I looped you into the discussion after you made fun of Pelosi for having had plastic surgery by calling her "stretch". I admit that in my book, it isn't as bad as what 69/70/75 directed at Senator Harris or Stacey Abrams. But I still find it unacceptable to mock people for their looks or to direct sexually derogatory language at women. Isn't that an example of the ad hominem that you rail against so frequently?

(04-27-2020 10:59 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Second, how exactly should the scenario that Kamala used her body to gain government appointments be worded so that it does not offend you? Or, in your book, is the idea that that may have happened the real issue?
...
I asked this of big (somewhat in jest), but that seems to continuously be thrown against the wall. So, what term is acceptable to denote the action of boinking for positin?

How do you refer to Willie Brown for his roll in the relationship? Maybe we can build off that to find something acceptable. How does 69/70/75 refer to Willie Brown for his roll in the relationship? I haven't seen him write anything bad about Willie Brown, but perhaps I missed it.