(04-27-2020 09:22 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-27-2020 09:12 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(04-27-2020 09:03 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(04-27-2020 08:52 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  Re: Tanq's inside information from the San Francisco DA's office... perhaps his contacts were up for advancement in the office and were competing with Harris? Perhaps there was some professional jealousy at play? Who knows for sure?

Funny, I dont see the other possibility in your litany of questions. Maybe all twenty-ish opinions are dead on? I might agree with your posit with one or two, but the sheer number kind of cuts against that.

But I note that that possibility isnt considered in your series of queries. Is it, 93?

See bolded.

(it's interesting that Willie and Kamala invited 20 (!) coworkers into their bedroom to provide them such keen insight into the nature of the relationship. Wild times in the 90's in SF I guess.)

Had you bothered to read, I believe I explicitly noted that those many people expressed their opinions. Good grief.

Good to note that you havent lost the snide-ass approach of denigrating items that run against your belief.

To use your construct -- it is interesting that you seemingly feel the urge to specifically denigrate anything that opposes your keen insight into the nature of the relationship. Wild times in '93-world I guess. Not the first time you have used that bush league approach either. Funny that.

And, I am glad to also know that when I say 'perhaps', it automatically and unilaterally means "I am including everything in creation as a possibility". *That* is new one for the books.....

Honestly surprised that you don't differentiate between the language that I used and language that implies 100% conviction.