It was fun to watch Angry Amy go puma-style on Professor Liz.

As opposed to making untrue comments in the heat of to whom she is speaking and the quest to drape oneself as the member of some victimized group, how many of the people here watched Professor Liz *absolutely* and *resolutely* refuse to answer any query on either how she would fund the 'FREE STUFF for all' she beats the war drum for, or that the middle class would be subject to higher taxes because of that?

Sample (paraphrase)

Q: isnt it true that the costs for your health plan would require raising taxes even on the middle class?
A: total outgoing medical costs for everyone would go down.

I like how this studious professor that prides her own expertise on the interactions of law with personal economics either cannot seemingly fathom the distinction between 'taxes' and 'overall costs', or just thinks everyone else is so gd stupid that the intended audience cannot fathom that difference.