(05-28-2019 10:17 PM)Statefan Wrote:  In 2011 the following ACC schools made the following money:

94 Million ND
87 Million Louisville
86 Million FSU
78 Million UVa
77 Million Duke
67 Million Clemson
62 Million MD

In 2010 MD was $24 million behind league leader FSU and $15 Million behind Duke and UVa

In 2017 the ACC had revenues as follows:

134 M ND + 40 M
123 M FSU + 37 M
112 M Louisivlle +25 M
100 M UVa + 22 M
95 M Clemson + 28 M
93 M Duke + 15 M

In the current 2017 year MD shows 94 Million in revenue, but $14 million is a transfer from the school that is made to support the programs. Rutgers is the only other P-5 that needs to do this.
That's only $80 million of real revenue.

In 2017 the B10 had revenues of:

185 Million Ohio State and Michigan
144 Million PSU
143 Million Wisky
130 Million Iowa
126 Million MSU
120 Million Nebraska
80 Million Maryland

In 2011 MD was $24 million behind the league leader FSU. Today they are 105 Million behind league leader Michigan and Ohio State. They are $40 to $60 million behind PSU, Wisky, Iowa, MSU, and Nebraska.

Looks like MD was not too bright.


Had Maryland elected to stay they would be at about $80 million today in the ACC - $40 million behind FSU, and $20 million behind Duke and UVa.


Of course as you have been told, MD did not leave for money, they left for spite and to further Kirwan's personal ambitions.

Get ND the hell out of there, they are partial members and don't participate in the FB side.

Also both Rutgers and Maryland aren't receiving a full share of B1G revenue yet. BTW Maryland cut a bunch of non revenue sports right before taking the B1G offer but they totally left for spite and not money right? Whatever helps you get to sleep at night and makes you believe UNC and UVA wouldn't leave you behind at the drop of a hat for a big pay raise.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/ma...0b06d01298

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/co...0e986e524a