(05-01-2019 11:29 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 11:18 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 06:22 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-01-2019 02:29 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(04-30-2019 08:52 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  OO, you obviously did not read the article about why CFA is back in the news...

This is hilarious.

I thought CFA was in the Rice news because your friends don’t like their religion. Is that national news?

Speak plainly - what is wrong with CFA? Who is upset with them and why?

Granted, I am traveling, and struggling to keep Up, thus this post at 2 am.

My friends? OO, hate to break it to you, but I know 0 people who are undergrads at Rice.

I provided information on why I thought the Hoot made the choice in Post #5 (which you responded to) and then Rice93 provided a news article that explained why they were back in the news in Post #8, and I then responded to it in Post #9, which is where you see Salvation Army first referenced.

We've already been down this road in this thread - go back and reread those posts.

Thought it was your friends who started it.

So, once again, what is the problem with CFA? Anybody, since Lad is dodging the question.

Dodging the question? Come on. Read his most recent response.

The issue was with their historical backing of entities that could be read as homophobic and/or against same-sex marriage.

The recent article references three entities that CFA has recently supported that some segment of the population still sees as problematic. This is likely a very tiny fraction of the population and all "leftists" on this board to date don't seem to have a problem with these entities.

Can't you tell, I'm dodging the question by referencing my responses from earlier in this thread!