(05-15-2019 03:00 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 02:49 PM)Seahawkhoops Wrote:  

(05-15-2019 02:44 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  Well, on the plus... I think both Vandy and Boise St are more in our wheel house of teams we can definitely compete with and grab a W.

Based on? I mean in theory i get it. But until i see some changes, i don't think i'd see us grabbing W's from anyone

Fine. I'll play your ridiculous game here.

Boise St last season: 13-20 overall; 8-9 home record; 8th place out of 11 in the Mountain West.

Vandy last season: 9-23 overall; 8-10 home record; dead last in the SEC.

Sure, we have our issues and you can pick at those all you want. But in terms of scheduling games with P5/6s that are winnable... this is the definition of that. Stanford, UNC, are great games to get on the schedule for experience and hopefully we compete well, but the odds are certainly against us. Games against Boise St and Vanderbilt... yeah, I'd argue we stand a decent chance of grabbing W's.

Your move sir.

Don't have to be so hostile. I asked a question which you gave a perfectly adequate position. Really no debate they would be more winnable than UNC or Stanford. Until i see something out of this staff I'd bet against us grabbing W's against almost anyone though. And that's not ridiculous, that's just fact. I wish it were different and hope it will be.