(02-23-2023 11:06 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(02-23-2023 10:54 AM)Frizzy Owl Wrote:  The bookstore owner is proactively challenging the ordinance. She hasn't actually been threatened or fined by the city yet. Another example of a law that's very poorly worded and wide open to challenge.

As are most laws that attempt to regulate speech-based activities. Aside from fraud, that is.

yeah...that free speech thing its past its prime: 'WE don't think WE can allow it to continue'

Morning Joe Declares Free Speech to Be 'Out of Date'

Quote:New York Times!! editorial board member Mara Gay concurred with Scarborough’s assessment, “You know, Joe, you're making a powerful case here that the law just, maybe it just is out of date."

She lamented that other people, who are not "journalists," have an expectation that the First Amendment applies to them as well, “The problem here is that the world has changed," Gay said.

Gay added, "I don't think WE can allow it to go on."

well, if the New York Times!! doesn't think free speech should be allowed to go on, well, then shut it down!

Who the he7ll is "We"???


btw: that is Gay!