(11-22-2022 12:46 AM)georgewebb Wrote:  

(11-22-2022 12:33 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(11-21-2022 09:44 PM)Frizzy Owl Wrote:  Are justices who creatively interpret the Constitution more or less likely to be influenced by lobbyists? Who created the monster?

I wonder why these organizations exist to influence conservative judges if they are immune to influence? Perhaps people just enjoy lighting their money on fire.

I think you're being dense. The point is not that political conservatives are immune to influence, but rather that a judiciary which across the board confines itself to legal interpretation rather than policy-making is less likely to be lobbied by policy partisans. It's not a hard concept.

And yet these organizations are created to lobby these judges that supposedly confine themselves to legal interpretation. Why? People enjoy setting their money on fire?