(07-01-2022 08:41 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(07-01-2022 08:06 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  Seriously? It was presented as an anecdote.

No it wasn't. Not really. If you did not intend for it to have probative value, why post it?

Quote:I didn't think that reasonable people would have to attach a disclaimer of "This is simply an anecdote and I do not see this as the final word on this discussion nor as a complete proof of my argument".

I think you probably need to.

I think 93 is having the proverbial 'bang your shoe on the table' event with this.

You'll note that he will in no way, shape, or form answer your first question. But his umbrage over the post being pointed out as emotive fluff is getting him irate.

Pardon me, its 'an anecdote'. All the difference. <banging shoe sound in the distance>

Edited to add: yep he went to a straight snippy deflection instead of answering your first question. <shoe bang, shoe bang, shoe bang>

No a bit of a change to that progression -- more of a (deflective response) followed by <shoe bang, shoe bang, shoe bang>