(02-06-2022 10:28 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(02-06-2022 10:16 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(02-06-2022 09:56 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(02-06-2022 09:15 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(02-05-2022 11:15 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  Got it. So you are reserving the right to say dickish things unprompted. Duly noted.


From the article that you posted: “ Godi, working under the username "H2rty," made more than 20 edits to Wikipedia pages for Jackson and her potential rivals vying for a spot on the Supreme Court, according to the Politico report.”

Makes it sound like she was trying to sully the reputation of her ex-boss’ competition.

A. Seems to be a right you enjoy. (Example: As opposed to other instances, this time I believe that you actually did what you said you did.). Why not me?

B. Missed that part. If Godi was working on instructions, that would make me think less of the judge, but if she were Biden’s choice, it would not be an obstacle. She would be confirmed.

Because Tanq and I have a very special relationship that involves being dickish to each other. You don't share that very special relationship, homie.

Joking aside... he was being dickish and I responded back in kind.

Yours was unprompted (hence my comment).

Absolutely I was dickish. I guess your constant clamoring for OO to find a quote of his for you (that in context of the actual topic really meant zero in terms of that topic except for the 'who is swinging the bigger dick' aspect), you find to be normal behavior. Sounds like a plan.

Thank you for confirming that. Have a great Sunday, pal.

You too my friend. Perhaps there is a nugget in the second sentence up there in my response as well.