(02-05-2019 01:46 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-05-2019 01:32 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(02-05-2019 11:41 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(02-05-2019 09:42 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Tom, it's ok to admit you dont support any protections for viable children and are comfortable with the fact that their birth is completely in the hands of how the mother is feeling.

I dont agree with you but that is clearly the position you have taken so dont dilly dally around it

I'd freely admit that if that was even remotely what I believe or have said here, but, it's not.

So what restrictions would you support for viable children

It's up to certified medical professionals to make that determination...and with every case being different, I don't what the government trying to legislate what viability is.

Ok, so based off your comment....if a woman found a doctor who signed off that her completley viable second or third term child was causing her mental anguish, you would support the abortion as a medical professional said it's for the greater good.

And you see no potential for abuse??