Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Author Message
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,335
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 8031
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #266
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(02-18-2019 12:25 PM)q5sys Wrote:  
(02-18-2019 12:03 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  Complete black out by the media too.
Wouldn’t you think some enterprising young reporter trying to cut their teeth would be chasing this story down?

It seems journalism is changed now. It used to be that if you wanted to get ahead you had to show your skill, find the story, research it, and then release it. Now you get ahead by towing the line and doing what you're told. You get ahead by being a talking head and being dependable to tow the line and give the proper approved responses.

Why else do you think you can watch a news story across all the major platforms and they're ALL using the same exact phrases and wording.
There's an understood rule of how you are supposed to say things and what you are supposed to say. At the end of the day, they're punching the clock and protecting that paycheck. They dont care about truth or upsetting anyone anymore... it's about acting the way they are supposed to so that they can climb the journalism ladder.

Well duh? Every media outlet of note is corporately owned. If you've worked within the mind hive of a corporate giant then you already know that editing is top down and stories are ground level up. If somebody bucks the system they are out. Our local newspaper does not go to press until every page layout is reviewed at the corporate top where it is edited for a wide array of things. Then the sanitized version is returned to the room that runs the plates and it goes to print.

I'm sure there are reporters out there chomping at the bit to get ahead. But none of them are going to risk a bad letter in their file to be passed along to other future corporate employers. It's a professional death sentence and one they won't have access to and therefore can't refute.
(This post was last modified: 02-18-2019 12:39 PM by JRsec.)
02-18-2019 12:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: 54 (+20) days since the public laid eyes on Ruth Bader Ginsburg - JRsec - 02-18-2019 12:38 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.