(01-13-2019 01:57 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(01-13-2019 12:56 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

(01-12-2019 01:22 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-12-2019 01:10 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  As I have said to you many many times Owl. This is not a tv show. You don’t get the bad guy by the third commercial break.

But you ought to be able to come up with something. I mean, the basic premise was that Trump colluded with "the Russians" to fix the 2016 presidential election. That's a pretty focused object to investigate. Instead of that, we've prosecuted Manafort for basically failing to file tax disclosure forms 8-10 years before the election, and Flynn for lying about contacts after the election that were perfectly appropriate for a member of a transition team to be having, and a bunch of Russian companies that he has no jurisdiction over for actions unrelated to any contact with Trump. I mean, by this time in Watergate, Nixon had been resigned for nearly half a year, and Mueller's not even getting warm.

It's the basic concept, "Orange man bad, so there must be something criminal somewhere, so keep looking until we find it." It's the same mentality that led Dan Rather to concoct a phony letter about GWB's national guard service.

Trump’s campaign chair Manafort shared polling data with the GRU who then used that information to do a psyop on Facebook. My God man you are incredibly obtuse. All we have so far.......

We have guilty pleas from Flynn, Manafort, Cohen and they are turning state witness. Some more than others and Manafort will be severely punished. Stone’s and DJT’s turn in the barrel will be coming soon.

Keep up Mach. The Times retracted that story. You are repeating a lie which was pointed out in your previous thread. I'll give you the benefit of a doubt and assume you keep reading blogs that repeat the same lies instead of assuming you are flat out lying here like the NYTimes does. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2...ess-17.php
"...The story now runs with this postscript: “A previous version of this article misidentified the people to whom Paul Manafort wanted a Russian associate to send polling data. Mr. Manafort wanted the data sent to two Ukrainian oligarchs, Serhiy Lyovochkin and Rinat Akhmetov, not Oleg V. Deripaska, a Russian oligarch close to the Kremlin.” Oops...."