(01-10-2019 01:56 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-10-2019 01:32 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-10-2019 10:19 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-09-2019 05:10 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I think both sides are totally f-ed up.

It's not a wall that we need, it's a reasonable and logical comprehensive immigration policy. The wall without such a policy is worthless. Such a policy without the wall is workable.

Problem is that the democrats see a wave of immigrant instant citizens as instant democrat voters. And so do republicans.

On what planet is this happening or EVER going to happen?

Uh, California, for starters.

Baby steps...
Non-citizens legally register to vote in San Francisco school elections


And there's an effort to remove "are you a citizen" from the census.

Lawmaker aims to get citizenship question removed from U.S. census

Still does not make them citizens, much less instant ones.

Thus the phrase "baby steps".

Would "slippery slope" have better made my point?