(08-29-2019 09:34 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(08-27-2019 09:14 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(08-27-2019 03:04 PM)stever20 Wrote:  correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the ACC RSN package gone now- with all games exclusive to the ACC Network?

No, they still remain as lost revenue for the ACCN. The legacy of the forced marriage with Raycom lives on through it.

That's a common situation. E.g., the SEC is still paying, via a poor split of revenue with ESPN, for the praised at the time but ultimately bad deal that Slive signed in 2008. The entire structure of the SECN, which is very favorable to ESPN, is colored by the terms of that bad deal. The ACC's revenue from the ACCN will also be adversely affected by the bad deal they signed with ESPN in 2010.

For the ACC and the SEC, it will be sometimes in the mid-2030s before the legacy of lowball deals signed before 2011 are completely washed out.

Oh no the SEC is in a much much better spot than the ACC. They negotiate with CBS and ESPN sooner and have no Raycom deal.
The ACC owns 0 if it’s games until the mid 2030’s and the ACC network won’t do very well with the little profits that come in going to ESPIN.