(01-11-2018 02:59 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-11-2018 02:57 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-11-2018 02:52 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(01-11-2018 02:49 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-11-2018 02:17 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Read the part bolded. Thats what I was responding to. The fact that someone is being a whineybutt because they cant find something that I located in 5 seconds is what was being dealt with.

Ummm...dude. YOU DIDN'T FIND WHAT TENNIS ASKED FOR, which was the assertion was that Steele gave different testimony. We want to see that testimony. Not an article on John McCain. The story you found had nothing to do with Steele's testimony because it had not even happened at the time of that article.

fail

You CANNOT be this ignorant.

Again, the original claim by Tech was as follows:

Quote:he was sued in England and sang a totally different tune when put in the witness stand. Don't recall where I read it, but it's out there.

To which Tennis replied:

Quote:How about do the research before posting crap like that, I looked for proof that he was even sued in the UK, which shouldn't be hard to find if it did happen, surprise surprise, nothing of the sort came up.

Then you posted a link to an article, that while it does mention a lawsuit, in no way provides the proof to corroborate what Tech said, in that Steele sang a different tune. Clearly, the main point of Tech's post was Steele changing his story...not just being sued.

I never was responding to anything Tech said. Some person, who needed handholding, could not find evidence of a lawsuit in the UK. I provided that. Quickly.

Good for you. I looked for it as well...and it took me several minutes and I had to read several articles to find anything on the UK stuff as almost all of them were about the US case. Regardless, tech's main point was still that he changed his tune. Something for which no credible evidence has been posted as of yet.