Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Oklahoma to new conference. preferred partner
Author Message
owl at the moon Offline
Eastern Screech Owl
*

Posts: 15,318
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 1620
I Root For: rice,smu,uh,unt
Location: 23 mbps from csnbbs
Post: #55
Oklahoma to new conference. preferred partner
(01-05-2018 11:35 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(01-05-2018 11:14 PM)templefootballfan Wrote:  SEC is not taking Okla much less OSU
who they moving east, Auburn or Auburn & Ala with Missouri moving west.
Va & NC are 1st on the list
SEC might be better off with VT & WV
maybe with Hous & Mia or [UCF is certainly moving into the picture]

And you know this how? In '91 when the discussions were held the path was clear. We looked West, not East. Our targets were Texas, Texas A&M, Arkansas, Florida State (who was independent) and looked East to one school (Clemson). There was a silent partner at the time for Texas (Oklahoma). Texas looked to the PAC, A&M couldn't shake free from Texas politics (there was a Baylor problem) Arkansas joined. ESPN didn't wan't the SEC to have total leverage over the state of Florida so the ACC (fully apprised of our offer which was looked over by a certain network) made their offer (a better one) the day before we showed up to make ours. Bobby Bowden cited an easier path to the playoffs as his reason and the rest is history. Some think Clemson only showed interest to spy, but either way a Clemson trustee told a South Carolina trustee we were looking so they applied and were accepted.

Here we are 25 years later and Arkansas is in. South Carolina took Clemson's slot. Missouri took Florida State's slot, and A&M is now in the SEC.

Who does that leave? Texas and Oklahoma.

As long as the SEC and ACC both have contracts with ESPN the SEC won't be taking an ACC school. So we continue to look West to the two best brands remaining on the table.

For the SEC to take ACC schools it would have to be after the Big 10 raided them and then we would be encouraged by ESPN to hold onto the brands they want most to keep. I give that less than a 5% chance of happening prior to 2034 which might be past the scope of my remaining years.


Since you brought up ‘91 and looking west, I’m told that with Arkansas in and the other prime expansion targets off the board that SEC feelers went out to Rice, as well. “Fix/Upgrade Rice Stadium, and we’ll sponsor Rice as #12.” Not sure whether this was before or after the SoCar application. We declined (partly out of loyalty! to SWC schools??). Curious if you’d heard any of that story.
01-06-2018 08:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Oklahoma to new conference. preferred partner - owl at the moon - 01-06-2018 08:59 AM



User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.