(10-10-2017 08:53 PM)WoodlandsOwl Wrote:  

(10-10-2017 08:21 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(10-10-2017 08:17 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Anyone buy this?

I will say it matches a report (I'll try to find and post it) of someone running behind the stage that was shot in the front of the leg. Paddock couldn't pull off such a shot from MB, but someone could definitely do so from the dirt mound or Oasis Apartments.

He makes a decent case and seems reasonable. I am not sure if I am smart enough to know whether his analysis is good or not. He is right that the independent media is the only people even asking questions like this.

Speed of sound calculation includes altitude, humidity and temperature.

He doesn't show the basis for his calculation of the speed of sound which would throw everything off.

Second, no factoring for the echos from the surrounding structures.

Third, you don't know where the location of these microphones, their orientation, or if they were moving while recording.

Same theory was used in the mid 70's re-investigation of the JFK Assassination. It only worked if the microphone was in a certain location. Problem is the photographic evidence showed the microphone in question was 200 yards from where it had to be to support the JFK second shooter theory.

Gunshot wound trajectory analysis would be better if any of that is being done.