(08-23-2017 04:40 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(08-23-2017 04:14 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(08-23-2017 03:43 PM)fanhood Wrote:  

(08-23-2017 01:52 PM)slhNavy91 Wrote:  

(08-23-2017 01:28 PM)TU4ever Wrote:  Lol you loss all claim to objectivity and an argument that you're not bias a loooong time ago. Pesik called you out in a thread about your mwc vs aac picks and made it very obvious.

But fanhood going to fanhood lol

Any credibility you had went to zero when you picked FAU who has a new coach (who hasn't vastly underperformed at every hc job, often with much better talent then at FAU) and has gone 3-9 the last three seasons over Navy who has had one season with fewer than 8 wins since 2003. Including going 8-5, 11-2, 9-5 in the same seasons where FAU had a total of 9 wins.

I hope you dont gamble a lot.

Remember your emotions are not reality.

Shhh!
I want him to bet FAU and give me 9 1/2 points for that "two scores"

I'll go with whatever Vegas says. $100 wager.

That's kind of my point - Vegas says Navy by two scores. You disagree with Vegas by four scores. But you don't want to give the points you're predicting.

Which is fine - my prediction is Navy by two TDs, so in keeping with the Vegas line...but this certainly could be a last-team-with-the-ball-wins type of game, so I don't like giving those points.

Fair enough. I'll give you 6 points.