Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Imagine an SEC schedule with Oklahoma and Oklahoma State
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
BePcr07 Offline
1st String

Posts: 1,435
Joined: Dec 2015
Reputation: 73
I Root For: Boise St & Zags
Post: #53
RE: Imagine an SEC schedule with Oklahoma and Oklahoma State
(08-17-2017 06:16 AM)XLance Wrote:  
(08-16-2017 04:32 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(08-16-2017 04:04 PM)XLance Wrote:  
(08-16-2017 01:16 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(08-16-2017 12:38 PM)XLance Wrote:  The dollars have gotten so big that the SEC can't afford to take Oklahoma State but they never would have. The real goal is and always has been is Texas AND Oklahoma

Of course it has been. Oklahoma State entered the discussion as yet another tool, or ploy, by which to corral Texas. Would they take Texas's slot? Would Oklahoma really move without Texas (quite possibly if OSU was taken care of as well)? Would the SEC even need Texas if Oklahoma came on board? While Texas would still add value the acquisition of Oklahoma gives the SEC everything they want in Texas when paired with the Aggies. Would Texas want to head to the Big 10 if Oklahoma and A&M and Arkansas were in the SEC? Possibly not because it would give too much intrinsic support within Texas for a conference that had so many familiar old faces.

So playing the Cowboys card has been, and remains an important part of this strategy. Why? Because an SEC with A&M, Oklahoma, Arkansas, L.S.U., and even O.S.U. would seem far more local an interesting to Texas viewers than Texas would seem if playing Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas in a Western division of the Big 10. (And the PAC is a non issue.)

The real question Xlance is would the SEC have executed that proposed move? I think the answer to that question is yes which is why it is an effective strategy. Why would we not execute a move that gives us Texas without taking Texas and which would cut them off from their natural support base with any decision they made that did not include being part of the SEC, except one?

Their only option in the face of OU / OSU to the SEC is the ACC as a partial where they could play Arkansas, Texas A&M and Oklahoma if they desired without having to join the SEC. This keeps them aloof but accepted within their own state. It pleases their fans and donors. And they don't have to suffer the humiliation of admitting that the SEC got the best of them. And that is why Finebaum and ESPN support the strategy of playing the OSU card. Either way ESPN gets Texas and Texas adds value to their product in both the SEC and ACC. End of story.

Because of today's dollars it's not much of a credible threat unless is has been ESPN's
goal to move Texas to the ACC the entire time.
It would certainly sew up the entire SouthWest by taking only three schools (only two new mouths to feed).
Texas could continue to play Oklahoma and rotate Arkansas and A&M and with a few AAC west games (out of: SMU, Texas Tech, Baylor, TCU, and Houston), they would have the whole area covered and with exposure up and down the east coast.

X, Texas in the ACC playing a partial schedule and playing SEC schools increases the value of both of ESPN's conferences and playing AAC schools heightens the profitability of those games as well. It is where Texas earns ESPN the most money. The SEC was there if Texas totally rejected the partial membership. But all cows have to be herded if you want them to get from point A to point B. The question hanging is whether they are accepting of either contingency. I think if they had made up their minds we would already have seen more action going on.

If they willingly go to the ACC I wonder if the SEC will push harder for another option besides OSU or if the pair has been approved by ESPN all along.

The Texas folks have been awfully quiet.
Heck, we haven't even seen many trial balloons regarding CR all summer. Either decisions have been made and details are being worked out, or they are stalling as long as possible for concessions.
BTW, Notre Dame just signed a two year series with Wisconsin....it appears the Cincinnati/West Virginia/UConn option is dead (remember Delany's comments about feeling "crowded" by the ACC). They now have series scheduled with Purdue, Ohio State, Michigan State, Michigan next year. One B1G team for the next 10 years or so. This will be the extent of the ACC's penetration into the midwest.

I still think Cincinnati, West Virginia, and Connecticut would be considered by the ACC down the road if conferences get that large. Those are 3 of the best options left outside the B1G, SEC, ACC, and PAC within the ACC footprint.
(This post was last modified: 08-17-2017 08:33 AM by BePcr07.)
08-17-2017 08:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 

Messages In This Thread
RE: Imagine an SEC schedule with Oklahoma and Oklahoma State - BePcr07 - 08-17-2017 08:33 AM

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Copyright © 2002-2019 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2019 MyBB Group.