(07-05-2017 02:12 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(07-05-2017 11:00 AM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(07-05-2017 10:40 AM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  

(07-05-2017 10:35 AM)msm96wolf Wrote:  Since I am a state's right guy, I have no issue if Ca does this. I hope they just don't complain if there is a backlash if other states or entities attempt to use this against them. Again, the only city that was truly hurt by NC HB2 was Charlotte. NC despite the inaccurate reporting had record years in tourism and industry gain. It was Charlotte that suffered, not NC losing the ACC Championship Games and NBA All-Star game. I will say the NCAA ban probably hurt some other cities but all those events are returning have NC went back to pre-existing law of HB2. Once again, why is NC still on CA ban list? Why would Texas believe if they change the law, CA will re-instate the travel?

Well, this is actually something the Federal government has a completely legitimate point in getting involved in.

Remember that little thing about interstate commerce?

That's what this is about.

All this stupidity about discrimination is just that, stupidity.

I think that the ICC might have some views on discrimination too. Not sure you want to open up that can of worms if you support the discriminatory bills.

To answer the previous posters question, NC is still on the list because HB2 still is in substantial effect. The 'solution' left in place a ban on protecting LGBT persons from discrimination. It was a full throated affirmation and endorsement of discrimination by the NC legislature.

Wow, for someone who admonished everyone to "not make this political" at the start of this thread, you sure haven't shied away from making it political.

What do you expect from a typical liberal loon from California? It is always do as I say, and I can do whatever I want as the rule only applies to peons who don't agree.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk