(06-27-2017 06:51 PM)Ewglenn Wrote:  

(06-25-2017 05:31 PM)fastbow Wrote:  

(06-25-2017 05:20 PM)Underdog Wrote:  Many might laugh… but a rebuilding and desperate B12 without Kansas would seriously consider WSU as a replacement even with an infant football program—which would likely be on Kansas’ level by then. Shock is partially right: “Presidents do not want WSU to use the AAC as a springboard for a football program because it would make WSU a... Big 12 candidate in a matter of a few years.” However, there is no way the SEC would add WSU when it could add either Kansas or Kansas St in my opinion….

Never happen. There's nowhere else for Kansas to go. Basketball alone won't earn them a Big 10 invite, and their football is Division 2 abysmal. They're not even marginally a fit for any other conference.

When the Big 12 dies, so will the University of Kansas's athletics.

I think the SEC would go OU and OK St before KU and KSU.

How about OU and OKSU to the SEC (makes 16), K|UCKERS to ACC (makes 16), WV and Texas to B1G (makes 16) leaving the Broken 12 with Silo-Tech, TCU, ISU, BU, and TT.

Broken12 then grabs Cincy, UConn, SMU, Houston, Memphis, Tulsa, Temple, UCF, USF, Tulane, WSU (basketball only), and Navy (football only). That makes 16 football, 16 basketball, and ECU as the gods of CUSA (or AAC if CUSA is absorbed).

I LIKEY! I'm sure I'm missing someone...


T


...