(05-06-2017 09:55 AM)JRsec Wrote:  AllTideUp noticed the Big 10 numbers for 2015 and 2016 were also given. However the math differential was not. Between 2015-2016 the Big 10 lost 448 million in revenue. Funny that the article would mention the SEC losing 70 million (actually 78 million, but not mention the 448 million lost by the Big 10 (1.59 billion to 1.142 billion).

The SEC's loss represents a difference of 1.66%. The Big 10's loss represents a loss of 39.2% (there's the story).

The SECN also launched on all sports streaming delivery systems. Those numbers are not accounted for in subscriptions and likely not in revenue. And talk about insignificance, the PAC network is only worth 305 million or .305 billion.

I stream the SECN on Playstation Vue now and I love it. If those numbers, along with Sling, etc. have not been added I doubt subscribers are being lost. The mass streaming era has begun. Streaming is to traditional subscriber service what vaping is doing to traditional tobacco usage.