The unofficial online home for fans of the UAB Blazers. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

(03-19-2017 03:11 PM)Memphis Blazer Wrote:  

(03-19-2017 02:25 PM)Big Dee Wrote:  Just accept the truth Davis was a better coach in a better conference with Memphis and Haase only won two more conference tourney games and had one NCAA win in a weaker conference.

Haase after going 16-15 made the big dance got lucky and fell face first the next year then bolted but hey Stanford hired right feather in the cap.

Saying Haase only won two more tournament games should also be considered in light that Davis coached two more years than Haase.

Winning percentage in the tournament is a more even way of looking at it.

Davis was 2-7 in the tournament. While CUSA was tougher (actually only Memphis made it tougher), he never faced any of those tough teams in the tournament.

Haase was 4-3 in the CUSA Tournament

So Davis was 22.2% in the CUSA tournament.
Haase was 57.1%

Anderson was 7-4 or 63.6%
Murry was 5-6 or 45.5%
Gene was 19-13 or 59.4%. Gene lost the opening round his last 6 years.

No its not his overall job is. if you nitpick then you say conference tournament record lol which isnt the only way to make the tournament. Davis won 100 so games, beat Anderson, and has a better winning percentage overall.
How many conference tournaments UAB ever won?


Its almost unrealistic to add Gene since nobody will probably stay here that long in todays climate.