Funny, did you all notice the 'assuming facts not in evidence' on Crespo's part? Probably not.

Here is what Crespo's line is based on:

Quote:'The agents, Cline says, were interested in the man in the video because, earlier, they'd seen him "in a crowd and in an area" where someone else was aiming a laser at the eyes of officers.'

Direct quote from the blog line.

If one bothers to actually look at the video provided, the official says 'the individual was in a crowd and in an area where an individual was aiming a laser at the eyes of the officers'.

As for lads comments, I think it is safe to say that he never bothered to track down the location of the van thing and locate it relative to the federal courthouse.

Getting back to the series of questions I asked above -- I take it you are now all on board with Federal officers wading en masse into a throng of violent shitbirds to make an arrest/detention? Sounds like a another fkload of fun there.

Im sure you guys with Rice degrees can see the very neat change in wording in the line from Crespo. Looks like the esteemed Harvard prof made up some evidence there. Nice trick when you can pull it off.