(07-18-2020 02:05 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-18-2020 01:58 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(07-18-2020 01:34 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-18-2020 01:19 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(07-18-2020 11:00 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Yed, how *dare* the Feds decide to enforce Federal law in the absence of local control. The temerity. The utter gall.

Didn’t take too long for you to defend the practice of government agents picking up citizens without identifying who they are, without indicating what crime had been committed, and throwing them into an unmarked vehicle in an area outside of a federal building, without consent or coordination with local or state officials.

Perhaps you should re-read the post I commented on, my comment to that, and *then* your 'everything and the kitchen sink' fairly radical expansion of my comment above.

Funny that your ***** session with Hambone has you complaining of the exact, same, expansion that you just did above. Jeezus fing Krist.

And yes, too fing bad the feds decide to enforce Federal law. Bummer. I assume the concept of dual sovereign kind of doesnt quite register at your end.

Obviously my post was in reference to these tactics in Portland bng carried out elsewhere - if the Feds want to come and stand guard of their courthouses, so be it. But we’re talking about them rounding up citizens in unmarked vans, outside of their facilities.

So the only role Federal authorities should undrtake is defense to prevent breaking of Federal law. Got it
Once the act is committed there should be nothing but local apprehension efforts. Sounds like a smashing **** up of a time

Hate to tell you the jurisdiction that z Fed can arrest detain or apprehend is..... checks notes... the entire jurisdiction of the United States. Shall we change that as well?

Again, I am criticizing their methods - stop moving the goal posts. If they had a warrant, clearly identified themselves, informed the person they were being arrested and what crime they were being arrested for, and didn’t throw them into an unmarked van, I don’t see the issue.

But the Feds in Portland did the exact opposite of each of those things.

Arguing against this means you support those tactics, you get that, right?