(07-02-2020 11:33 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(07-02-2020 11:18 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Nothing I've said indicates I don't understand your perspective in this regard - y'all have made that idea up to try and, as I put it, put lipstick on a pig.

Your opinions create a situation where you're willing to vote for a candidate who can do X, Y, and Z odious things, simply because of how much you dislike the opponent's position. Am I wrong?

Yes, you are wrong

Numbers is (and really all of us are) questioning your description of these 'odious' things.

You've presumed a fact not in evidence, that Trump 'sat by'. Also ignoring how such a charge compares to his opponent.... who also sat by (or worse) while odius things happened... Put the Bengazi shoe on the other foot... You'd still (and I suspect, did) vote for Hillary despite that odor... I suspect because you didn't accept the partisan conclusion being put forth by the right.

You've presumed that he's shot someone on 5th avenue, but is somehow still on the ticket. I suspect that if Trump were removed from the ticket by virtue of having shot someone, that numbers would vote for his Republican replacement... because Texas would now likely be in play... and voting for Trump in that case would be stupid, unless it's so late that he's still on the ticket formally but can't be sworn in... in which case you're really voting for Pence.

So you've put forth a ridiculous premise....

All the while trying to ignore that your own party has OPENLY SOLICITED people to NOT vote for their preferred candidate, but instead to ignore any concerns they may have about Biden, his policies, his 'odiousness' or anything else.

As an FYI, I did not put forth the 5th Avenue premise - Donald Trump put forth a premise of him shooting someone on 5th Avenue, and still having supporters.

Lol - high comedy right there.