(07-01-2020 10:31 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(07-01-2020 10:19 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(07-01-2020 10:07 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(07-01-2020 10:05 AM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(07-01-2020 09:53 AM)At Ease Wrote:  Trump's base [projected]: We don't care if Trump shot someone on 5th avenue, the Democrats must be stopped.

Rice poster [actual]: I don't care if Trump sat idly as our troops were targeted and shot, Democrats must be stopped.

Hambone: I just can't see where you get off trying to equate the two, where is your common sense.

Please quote the actual times those words were used. If they weren't, and I'm confident they weren't... then you're arguing with the voices in your head that you're assigning to others.

That's on you, pumpkin.

yeah, he lied about what I said.

He lied about what I said as well.

'Equating' the two and 'being indistinguishable' are not remotely the same thing.

As I pointed out... you didn't vote at all last time and Numbers (and I and others) voted 3rd party. That is clearly not the same as 'supporting Trump'. People who support Trump obviously vote FOR Trump.

The fact that neither of these decisions gives a vote to Biden does not make the rationale 'indistinguishable' to anyone above perhaps a 5th grade education.

As I have said, I will vote for Trump in 2020 after sitting out 2016. But that is based on Trump's results, not some cult like following of the man, as it seems people mean when they refer to his "base'.

It does bring up the question, is a cult like allegiance to a party better than a cult like allegiance to an individual? ( before making an answer, consider Sanders and Hillary)

Is it better than a cult like hatred to a party, an individual, or to posters? (consider WAM)