(05-21-2020 09:00 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-21-2020 06:21 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  OO, you’ve made this semantic argument again about the term “qualified” to avoid the entire point of the argument. So how about this, Ivanka and Kushner don’t have the background or experience to be serving the POTUS and United States in the roles they fill.

What about Kushner’s background or experience makes you think that, had he not been related to POTUS, that he would have been picked out of the crowd to lead: emergency response supply chain, Middle East peace, industry innovation, the opioid crisis response, and criminal justice reform.

So I won’t use the word qualified, instead I will change it to lacks the experience, education, background, or training to be an obvious candidate for the job - outside of his close personal connection to Trump. It sounds like you’re fine and peachy with clear-cut nepotism, which hasn’t been cool since JFK (we put in anti-nepotism laws because of JFK, by the way).

Because it is whom the President trusts to do that job.... much like when Bill Clinton selected his wife to lead the task force in an official capacity to overhaul healthcare. And if you are not aware, that was when Hillary was nothing more than the President's wife, land developer, S&L scion, and cattle futures genius. Apparently just following her first stint in the fine art of records destruction and concealment.