(05-19-2020 01:44 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-19-2020 12:32 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-19-2020 12:04 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-19-2020 11:56 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Perhaps you can tell us how it is McConnell's fault that the Treasury was unmasking everyone on the opposition from 2015?

Or how it is McConnell's fault that for some unfathomable reason that Treasury was using the unmasking process like lotto tickets?

Yep, cus I really said, or even suggested, that everything is McConnell's fault... Great deflection there.

Explain 2 things to me.
1) How did the Treasury target any specific individuals through unmasking?
2) Are you certain that Flynn was not involved in conversations with foreign officials/agents relevant to Treasury sanctions between 2015 and 2016?

I suggest you read the linked article, lad. Or not. Or wave your hands some more.

As for deflections, you follow up your comment about them with a fing world class set, mind you... lolz. As was your deflection about the trust in the transition of power being all McConnell's fault, as well. Double lolz.

Read the article, that is why I asked these questions.

The article doesn't answer either of those critical questions.

I did read the article. What struck me was the depth, width, *and* pervasiveness of unmasking requests from a non NatSec sector. Even outside of Flynn.

I guess that angle eluded you.

But when one enables the lad- 'no smoke EVAH from the democratic side' themed filter, I can readily understand that stance.