(01-23-2020 06:33 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(01-22-2020 11:35 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(01-22-2020 05:50 PM)mrbig Wrote:  

(01-22-2020 05:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I asked what would be the difference. You offered up Biden as being a Democrat being a major difference in the thought experiment, like a galvanic response. Obviously Ted Cruz Jr instead of Hunter the coke whore makes a difference that engendered that response.

And no offense, if any ® were put into the place of Hunter Coke World then Democrats would not only *not* impeach, they would revel in it. Again, this points out and underscores the fing partisan sham that it is.

Do we really need to be mocking people for their drug addiction or drug abuse problems? Do we really need to be using words like "whore"?

What words did the Democrats use to describe Stormy Daniels?

Not sure. I know they described her progression (stripped and porn star), which she almost certainly self-identified as.

Any idea on your end?

Bimbo, whore, trash. Because she was associated with Trump, there was no holding back on the invective. I did not once hear anybody say "it's her body she can do what she wants with it".

But in the case of Hunter, I think the words "coke whore" probably refer to somebody addicted who would do anything to get the money. I don't think Hunter stood on a corner offering his body like a real coke whole. I bet there are lots rich, influential people addicted to drugs, who, because of their situation, do not have to sell themselves. Well, not their body, anyway. Certainly Hunter was selling something. Parental influence, maybe.

But other words and phrases do describe Hunter better than coke whore. That would not be my choice.

OK, I answered your question. Your turn.

Why are Democrats fighting so hard to keep Hunter and Joe from testifying under oath?