(01-18-2020 10:48 PM)Foff Wrote:  

(01-18-2020 04:46 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-18-2020 04:15 PM)Foff Wrote:  

(01-13-2020 10:46 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Harris is also known for seeking and obtaining unreasonably harsh sentences for minor drug crimes as a prosecutor, at the same time she was using marijuana herself.

false. except for her being a prosecutor. is this intentional lie, or are you simply misinformed??

Not misinformed at all. I think the record is pretty clear. It was certainly clear enough that Tulsi Gabbard attacked her about it in a debate, after which Harris's campaign pretty much tanked. I suppose I might have said "seeking unreasonably harsh sentences for minor offenders of various sorts."

you might have said something true, but you chose not to
harris did NOT use marijuana while she was prosecutor. so,, lie or misunderstanding?
"unreasonably harsh" is completely wrong about how she treated marijuana. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mercury...cases/amp/
lie or misunderstanding?
don't know why you backpedal to take out the "drug" from "minor drug crimes". doesnt help your case any,,, theres zero support for her being harsh on minor nondrug offenses. try again.

On what basis do we know that Harris did not use marijuana while prosecutor? Her assertion or independent verification?

And I would say that the statistics quoted in the article look more like any attempt at rationalization than actually proving what you assert that they do. She was attacked by Gabbard, and it unraveled her campaign. If she had an effective reply, she should have used it then, Se didn't.