(01-06-2020 10:24 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(01-06-2020 09:46 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-06-2020 09:44 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(01-06-2020 09:17 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(01-06-2020 08:44 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  You don’t believe that?
May I point you to OO’s response to the same question?

I don't believe what?
And I'll let OO speak for OO and I'll speak for me.

Quote:I don't know that anyone on here believes that, and I'd like to think not.

Not following.

Your initial comment was to Big's response to this OO quote, which implicitly says there are people here that are on the side of Death to America:

Quote:So whether the promise is more sanctions or a drone strike or a nuke, people who shout "Death to America" better know the difference between the POTUS then and the POTUS now. And people here should not be on the side of the Death to Americans just to oppose Trump.

I asked OO to clarify what people he was talking about and he said:

(01-05-2020 09:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(01-05-2020 11:22 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(01-05-2020 09:35 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  The ones who oppose strong action against terrorists. (Don’t hurt them, don’t capture them, don’t hold them, you might make them mad)

The ones who support the Iranian nuclear deal.

The ones who would prefer to see a softer, more apologetic approach to Mid East relations - more Obama like, lessTrump like. (Please stop what you doing, we will give you money.)

If none of this applies to anybody here, then I am not referring to them.

So you're literally equating having a different approach to foreign policy to directly supporting people shouting death to America?

Indirectly.

So, I pointed out that OO does believe that people on this board are supporting those who chant death to America.