(12-15-2019 06:20 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Lad -- I am pointing out that *you* simply redefined 'base' to whatever small group *you*, in your oh so cute way, wish and want it to be.

And when called out on that redefinition proceed down some garbage semantic patented lad dance.

Cry some more, lad.

And the funny thing, lad, is that *your* redefinition and (continued die hard last man) defense of it is a defense of a concept that is, on its surface and easily understood to be, fairly abjectly as ignorant (if taken at your face value) as that of the people that you complain about.

Yes, you saying that 'his most loyal' would be less fing ignorant; debatable -- but absolutely less ignorant than what you are maddy poo abut being called out on.

Absolutely fing rich!

And in light of OOs example of the issue to you, in which you could have backed down and said 'let me rephrase', simply told him 'cute' -- and then *again* doubled down on with yet *another* crapola redefinition.

Doubly rich!

I think you need some more castanets in todays version of your cha cha cha.....

Wait, you’re saying that when asked what I consider someone’s base I, shocking, defined who I thought the definition was? STOP THE *** **** PRESSES.

Yes, it is me who is crying in this situation, not the person who can’t handle a difference of opinion.

Bye Felicia.