Quote:it’s not doing to necessary follow up reporting and passing off out of context tapes as PROOF of wrong doing that is garbage.

Did you even read the contents of your third link? What was discussed there has zero to do with your comment above you might note.

As for PROOF of wrongdoing, I might agree. But many times more than not, when some of the targets actually say the words, sentences, phrases, and paragraphs that they utter, especially given their positions, I think it many times very thought provoking (at the very least) WHY someone like that might mention the actions that they do.

For example --- the Robert O'Rourke area campaign manager who readily admitted to breaking US immigration law on camera to the O'Keefe hidden cameras. While not proof regarding Robert or his campaign, it *absolutely* brings into question why the fk a campaign would hire such a staffer in the first place.

Or the 'private' operations guy, who was filmed on the phone with the DNC and separately with high level Hillary campaign staffers. And then on-camera noted that he was hired and directed by the DNC and the Hillary campaign to 'start fights at Trump events'. No jump cuts, no edits.

Garbage? Toss it out?

And yes, I think jump cuts that destroy the context are terrible. I would think you do as well. But in your rush to clobber PV with that practice, I find it astounding that you dont even note the biggest fking jump cut scam in modern political history --- that is the Trump 'good people' issue. That is what I driving at lad.