(08-22-2019 03:37 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 03:29 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 03:00 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  I'm having a hard time getting past the fact that first you labelled Kamala Harris as a "slut" and now she is "some bimbo" in your example.

The "some bimbo" refers to some hypothetical person who shacked up with Trump. I don't think Kamala Harris is a hypothetical person (unfortunately) and I can't see her shacking up with Donald Trump, so I don't quite understand your quandary.

So why not just say "some woman" instead of "some bimbo"? Obviously placing "some bimbo" in your example negates the value of the comparison unless you also think Kamala Harris qualifies as a "bimbo". But you didn't need me to tell you that.

I do like how the king of non-stating that Trump (followers, supporters, voters) are ignorant is incensed, incensed! mind you, of the *implication* of K Harris as a 'bimbo' for garnering two! state appointments because of Willie's willy. This is rich.

This is as good as Louis Renault in 'Casablanca'.

Quote:

Quote:And if you want to engage in further discussion with me, you probably have to find a way to get past my labelling her as a slut. Because I'm not retracting. As I noted, "prostitute" may be more technically correct, but "slut" rolls off the tongue a lot easier.

OK... go to your grave thinking it is just fine to call Kamala Harris a slut. We'll agree to disagree that it's incredibly disrespectful to Harris and to women in general.

Any less disrespectful than garnering two state appointments by being Willy's bouncy house toy?

I mean, that is such an incredibly powerful role model story there...... How in the hell is that method of garnering appointments 'respectful to women in general' in even the slightest manner? lol....

This outrage is comedy gold.