(08-22-2019 02:33 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 01:35 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-22-2019 01:16 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Considering all the issue coming back from you is the board equivalent of 'ignore that man behind the curtain' in light of the facts of the matter ---

What is *your* opinion of the Speaker of the Assembly appointing a person who is amazingly junior in a professional capacity to two statewide commissions, all occurring while the two were doing the horizontal tango? Funny, I havent heard a word from you specifically on that subject.

You seem to have great insight into the politics of this San Francisco DA's office in the early 1990s. Were these appointments truly out-of-left-field for somebody with Harris' background? Perhaps everything that you say is spot-on... perhaps it's not. Where are you getting this information from?

I learned quite a bit of the inside from personal friends who worked in the SF DA office at the time in question. But that is immaterial since I really havent posted those insights in the slightest, just the bald facts which are stupendously easy to verify.

The funny thing is that you squawk about everything I have posted as being supposition.

No. I asked you where you were getting all of your information about the SF DA's office. The supposition that I pointed to involved your assumptions about Harris' relationship with Brown.

Quote:If you bothered, everything I have said *is* spot on. I have only related cold, hard, easily verified facts. Which one of those facts do you disagree with? Or dont like?

What I *havent* related is the background in the DA's office at the time. Should I repeat those here so you actually have a reason to get all lathered up about background?

Now all I *have* said here is stuff that is easily verifiable. Like Harris' job title, the position in the DA's office that held, and the fact that she was doinking Willie at the time. And it is undisputed the dates that Slick Willie appointed her. Criminy, if you are so enraptured about the source and facts you can use Google for that level.

Not sure if "What type of committee appointments were assistant DA's in the San Francisco DA's office routinely receiving in the 1990s" would have provided much juice from Google.

Quote:What I *havent* said is the massive actual political fallout in the DA office because of those appointments. But given the absolute and resolute resistance you show to actual verifiable and hard facts, my guess is that will *really* get your goat running wild.....

Which verifiable facts? Where you say that her committee appointments were way out-of-bounds for somebody at her level? I'm not saying you are wrong... but it's not like I had a way of "verifying" that information.

Quote:Please do tell where I have related 'insights into the SF DA office' from 1990 - 1995? I am at an utter fing loss which facts I have related show such 'insight' that you sardonically and sarcastically refer to. As noted before I will be more than happy to relate those as they were told to me from members of the SF DA at that time.

You are giving me heresay from a buddy or buddies that may have worked at the SF DA's office around the same time as Harris. Maybe this is all accurate. Maybe your buddy has/had an axe to grind. I don't know.