(08-20-2019 02:54 PM)Fort Bend Owl Wrote:  [quote='Owl 69/70/75' pid='16245245' dateline='1566307911']
[quote='Fort Bend Owl' pid='16245120' dateline='1566300888']
You guys continue to completely miss the mark on priorities, but why does that surprise me when you're talking about a group of angry old men who aren't in touch with the majority of society? To hear you talk about it, Democrats are universally united in their goal to completely change our economic system.
...
But keep getting it wrong, y'all. That's the type of narrow focus that hopefully will allow us to regain the White House in 2020.

Quote:Just had one more thought. I think you have got republicans all wrong too. The idea that you can dismiss them as "angry old men" or "deplorable" is what beat Hilary in 2016, and if you keep it up you will drive away what used to be your bread-and-butter voters in 2020.

I really think 2020 will come down to which candidate antagonizes the fewest voters. That's a very sad state of affairs, but I think we've gotten to that point.

I'm not dismissing all Republicans as Angry Old Men - just you, tang and OO. Maybe it's because I just saw 12 Angry Men again recently on TV. You can choose which character you want to be - Lee J. Cobb, E.G. Marshall or Ed Begley. I choose to believe I'm the Henry Fonda character.

Not everyone -- just anyone with whom you disagree apparently. You are a laugh a minute there when context is added.

By the way sparkles, I am not a Republican. Or, is that your simplistic veneer on anyone who disagrees with you? (funny how that trait keeps popping up....)