(07-17-2019 04:39 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(07-17-2019 04:29 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-17-2019 04:25 PM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(07-17-2019 04:17 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-17-2019 04:09 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  I guess I thought the insult was toward you.

But in any case, as a non PC Policeman, what do you think of the dialogue/ Anything racist there?

As a nitpick, not all are kids. But perhaps you didnt type that. Remeber, I donnt reed wehl.

Nice try on the somewhat false add-on to gain 'he is bad' points.

You all are really going to town on the stereotypes of progressives today.

Perhaps... can we agree that you guys are really living up to the stereotypes of right-wingers today?

Funny you dont bother to defend you inclusion of kids in your barb. Kneejerk reaction to bring kids into the mix?

When I think of the "short bus" that you referenced, I general think of children with special needs. You're right, sometimes there are special needs adults now that you bring it up. Guess what? Still not any better, Tanq!

Quote:Nor do you bother to explain why you added the comment about Trumps base lapping it up after your first sentence of Trump is flinging poo.


Why did you 93? Not a rhetorical question here 93, a straight dead serious one. What do you feel that add-on brought forth? What did it add in your mind?

I'm not understanding the "add-on"? Why did I make the comment in the first place? Because I thought that maybe his base wouldn't have a problem with his tweets. I'm pretty sure that I'm right. It looks like even most Republican congressmen and women don't have a problem with those tweets. I believe that Trump's base is OK with a lot of Trump behavior that I personally find very questionable. Is this belief the same as you calling somebody a "retard"? I don't think the two ideas are especially related.

So you dont think that "Trump flings poo. Trump supporters dont care" isnt talking badly about Trump supporters. Interesting point of view.

I mean you (and the lad) go absolutely ape **** if any reference is made in any tangential way about one of about a thousand classifications (or sub-classifications to about the 10th degree), and you dont understand that your 'add on' comment doesnt come across as smug and condescending.

That is a very interesting type of myopy there, my friend.

I mean, the topic was *solely* Trump's comments to that point. You were the one that tacked on that comment about his followers. Why feel the absolute urge to include his followers (supporters, base, whatever the fk you want to call the group on this bounce house jump) in your comment? Not that you *did* include them, but why the need to include that obvious non-sequitor of a sentence? Just because?

Obviously not your deep and unbridled respect for them, but why include them in the conversation *at all*? That is if not to go off on a self preening moral judgement of them, I mean. I am sure that was never the case, but there is a reason that you feel the overriding urge to 'drop them into the action'. What is it?