(05-14-2019 01:47 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-14-2019 01:29 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(05-14-2019 01:10 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(05-14-2019 11:18 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  The dossier is just a small part of what I want to know about. AFAIAC, this should not be
an investigation into just the dossier, but into the motivations and methods of those who used and provided it.

There is evidence that some within the government wanted to thwart the election and after the election, nullify it. I think the biggest threats to our democracy lie within the government, not overseas.

I have to wonder if any of this will lead to Hillary and/or Obama.

I hope that this will include the Tarmac meeting.

I know why this was not done earlier. To institute this investigation before Mueller was concluded would be to invite allegations of OOJ, and perhaps rightly so.

Wouldn't shock me at all if some small fish ended up indicted for lying to the investigation. Maybe even a little money laundering and campaign finance violations.

What evidence are you talking about?

And why would this include the tarmac meeting? That meeting was in June 2016 and has always been related to Benghazi-gate.

Related to email-gate you mean. Benghazi was the instance that made Hillary's server known -- way more than Benghazi resided on it.

Not really germane to the point, which is that it seems unrelated entirely to the Russia investigation.

Some consistently blend Benghazi in with the totality of the email stuff.

And yes, the tarmac meeting at least to me is seemingly unrelated. Kind of like the relation of Manafort's tax evasion to Russian collusion, eh?