(04-16-2019 10:07 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(04-16-2019 09:19 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I guess because thr truth of the matter is the one *you* refuse to talk about or consider.

Mueller was a fing fiasco, and they need a bone with even non-germane marrow in to grab onto to satisfy their followers.

So you seemingly overlook that massive venality to whine about being labeled 'not smart'.

Bluntly it is either amazingly ignorant to chase down the returns road, or a mark of obsession to find or even churn up the water around orange man. Rather venal in that regard.

Yet you focus not on the churning action, but get aggravated over a comment that, while blunt, is fairly accurate. Please flap your arms some more on this....

I take a lot more umbrage with y'all suggesting that Sanders wasn't, in effect, calling Congress stupid, than her basically calling them stupid.

I understand why she was calling them stupid - I just disagree with it. I don't understand why it is seemingly so hard for y'all to agree with me that she was calling them stupid. Owl#s has argued with me that she wasn't calling them stupid, and then effectively called them stupid.

How hard would it have been to initially just said, "Yeah, she called them stupid, but they are because of X, Y, and Z."?

I like the continued use of 'in effect' to ram home your false equivalence. flap flap flap flap.....