(03-27-2019 02:52 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Really interesting idea I just saw, and potentially an argument for keeping the Mueller report under wraps

Quote:
Imagine if the Starr Report had been provided only to President Clinton's Attorney General, Janet Reno, who then read it privately and published a 4-page letter based on her private reading stating her conclusion that President Clinton committed no crimes.

I believe Ken Starr recently stated, and I understand this to be correct, that the procedures in effect at that time were different, so such an event could and would not have occurred.

I also believe that in that event Starr would have had both the right and the constitutional duty to have set the record straight, and I fully believe that he would have done so in very short order. I believe that right and constitutional duty would also extend to Bobby Three Sticks, and so far he had remained silent.

I want to see the full report. I understand some minor parts my have to be redacted because of statutory limitations, but from the context I do not believe that they will be material, in either scope or extent.