(08-17-2018 09:25 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Just so we're clear, I don't think Trump is guilty of a crime, based on what we know right now. And I haven't suggested as such, nor asked you to tell me if you thought he was guilty of a crime. I'm not sure why you brought up legality of actions we know about, when I never did. I specifically wanted opinions on the actions of the Trump campaign, not on the legality of them. People are critical of other's actions for reasons far more wide ranging than their legality.
I've also been steadfast in maintaining that I find it more likely that Trump campaign officials were involved with conspiracy/collusion activities, and not Trump, if any happened. Yet for some reason, all of the responses I keep getting seem to imply that I'm suggesting Trump himself is guilty of a crime. Almost like people are arguing against a position that I'm not taking...
I can dig a bit more into your responses later.

I would agree that there is no evidence to convict Trump of a crime. There is sufficient evidence to convict Hillary of several crimes. So why are we investigating Trump with full force and fury, but not Hillary?

I would agree that there is a higher likelihood that persons in the Trump campaign were involved in conspiracy/collusion activities than Trump himself. I would say exactly the same thing about the Hillary campaign. But I've not seen enough to convict anyone in either campaign. That's the reason for my earlier and longer post asking a bunch of questions.

That's been my point all along. Apply the law evenly to everyone with equal vigor, and let the chips fall where they may. Don't prosecute people for political reasons. That's banana republic stuff.