Nice snarky answer on the Sessions retort. Real cute.

As for the warrant, glad you are all on board with peddling a campaign-generated oppo research, using that as the primary focus of a warrant, then passing that dossier out to the news organizations, then using the news as primary sources that back that first primary source.

Colot me shocked that you dont see the problem there.

Color me shocked that you dont see the major problem with the 'first hand information problem' ladled through it as well.

Color me shocked that you dont see the major amount of misleading if not downright dishonest items in the sections on the Steele memo in the warrant.

And color me shocked that you dont see any problems with Strzok, especially in light of the fun-filled 'interview' he engaged in week before last.

Yep, everything hunky-dory around those corners....

By the way the comments about the bevy of intelligence officials that surround the piece of crap wasnt about them 'being' in the Obama administration. The question that was asked referred to your previous screed about the Republicans being hypocritical abut their stance *about* the intelligence community. Given that stack of **** that just came to light, I dont see much fault re: the republicans being *very* critical of the intelligence community. *That* was the import of who did or did not sign the, and who probably was the redacted agent sending this up.

But dont let yor apparent misreading stand in the way of a snark, mind you.