Post two.

This goes to the last sentence of your post in which you (somewhat belatedly) state that 'the reasoning for a common end result' (notwithstanding your rampant weasel word use to shoehorn vastly different outcomes into one common word) is 'different'.

Do you realize that by your listing of 'broadly worded goals' (I'll spot you that shortfall this post) without reference to 'reason' I can readily use that same technique to show vast amounts of common cause between the *actual* Nazi Party (Germany 1930's variety) and the current liberal/progressive movement?

Even gd easier with Communism.

Even more gd easier with Socialism.

I personally think that 'reason behind' a goal *is* a fundamental difference in the idea of a political principle, and I personally think it would be drastically unfair for me to label the Democrats (or modern progressives) as a 'faction' of the National Socialist Workers movement. But using your 'proof methodology' in the previous post it would be somewhat fairly easy to do. My fingers are tired, though. But tell me if you want that similar modern progressives are a 'faction of' any of the above the through your rather interesting exercise in 'proof of faction' supplied previously.

It would be pointless from this perspective, since, as I said, I do think that 'different reasons' *and* 'differences in scope of the goal' matter, so the exercise would be on that I really don't believe. But, I will be happy to perform it for you at your request.